29 November

Review: Scorcese’s Great Epic, “The Irishman

by Jon Katz

Martin Scorcese’s Irishman is an epic mob drama, a great and poignant movie, the kind of expensive and grand movie the Hollywood Studios would never make, but which Netflix did.

It’s out in movie theaters for a couple of weeks and also streaming on Netflix, and says much about the future of moviemaking, to Hollywood and us movie lovers.

The movie is slow, beautiful, and melancholic. I have no crystal ball, but I’d be surprised if it didn’t turn up on future Great American Movie Lists soon. It’s three and a half hours long, yet it didn’t feel too long to me at all.

One critic said the movie was long and dark, like a novel by Dostoyevsky.

I should disclose that I grew up in the heydey of the American Mob, and as a reporter, I met, saw and interviewed several of the characters referenced in the film – Philadelphia Mob Boss Angelo Bruno, Teamster President Jimmy Hoffa, Philadelphia Mayor Frank Rizzo, Atlantic City Boss Skinny D’Amato (discoverer of Frank Sinatra and Martin and Lewis.)

I can say that Scorcese has done his homework, he gets these people, their culture, their language, their inverted morals and their love of family.

I can imagine that some people, weaned on the Superhero Era, might find the movie dawdling and even borning.

It never wavered for me, and what a fantastic film that showcased the great cinematic actors and chroniclers of organized crime, Scorcese (Goodfellas, Casino, Gangs Of New York) and Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Al Pacino.

I have little patience for too long movies, but this one didn’t feel nearly as long as it is, it just flowed and flowed and carried the audience along.

All of these actors were great, and thanks to the miracle of digital de-aging technology, the trio – all in their 70’s now – reunited for this sweeping story as it spans six decades.

The story is framed around a mob “peace mission”  – a 1975 road trip from Pennsylvania to Michigan with frequent cigarette breaks and bloody flashbacks. The violence is the movie is restrained and not jarring if that matters. The Joker and Spiderman are a lot more bloodthirsty.

In tone and pace, The Irishman is very different from Goodfellas, although the dialogue in this movie is brilliant and genuine, as it is in most Scorcese films.

The movie tells the story of Frank Sheeran, a second world war veteran turned thief, fixer, and killer.

Scorcese has chosen to use Sheeran – a bodyguard for Hoffa – to tell the story of Hoffa’s rise and fall as head of the powerful Teamster’s Union and his mysterious and still unsolved disappearance. He was presumed to have been murdered.

Pacino plays the volatile Hoffa as an over-the-top madman who sees Sheeran as a son. Like all mob bosses, he senses he will one day be betrayed because everyone in every mob movie is ultimately betrayed.

Pesci, who is returning to movies after a 15-year absence, was terrific, he was soft-spoken, statesman-like and patient, human and evil at the same time playing Russell Buffalino, Frank’s closest boss and friend.

The movie has a lot of funny dialogue, full of wise guy lore “You charge a gun; with a knife, you run,” and it “is what it is,” which means run for your life.

Frank (De Niro) is the narrator, speaking from a nursing home in Pennsylvania,  sometimes speaking directly into the camera documentary style.

“But the mood is different this time around,” wrote A.O. Scott in his review in the New York Times,  “even if we recognize a few of the faces. The anecdotes, some of which are funny, some horrifying, are edged with a bleak sense of absurdity and shadowed by the rapid onset of oblivion. Death is close at hand.”

The movie, for all its sweep and skill (the transitions are managed smoothly), has a somber tone running through it, like a stream or railroad track.

This culminates in the last bleak half-hour, which is heartbreaking. Our heartless hitman loved and protected by some vicious supporters, is reduced to hobbling on his walker to unsuccessful beg his daughter to talk to him.

In most movies and TV shows that deal with family, the end would have been their miraculous coming together.

The man who showed no mercy to so many people in his lifetime gets none at the end of his own life. We think of these people as powerful and strong.

But Scorcese challenges us to think of what they become. They can be frail and disappointed too.

The film opens with Sheeran in his 80’s, frail and lonely (his wife has just died, and his favorite daughter hasn’t spoken to him in decades). Sheeran is a cold fish in many ways, willing to kill and kill for his mob friends and mentors, but as he ages, he finds himself looking back on his life with a mixture of pride and regret.

The movie is well worth it to see De Niro, Pesci (who was terrific) and Pacino act for several hours. But beyond that, the movie is enthralling, chilling but not nearly as violent as a Superhero movie; I’d call it a long-form grand slam, a knockout.

One thing that stands out is  Scorcese’s much-document lack of women at the heart of any of his work (except maybe for Sharon  Stone in Casino).

The digital facial and aging software didn’t bother me; it was barely visible much of the time. The women here either melt into scolds or enablers or are just standing out of their husband’s earshot smoking.

This long and hard-hitting movie seems almost glaringly out of sync with movies these days. There have been some influential books and stories written about the women in this crime, and the agonies and humiliations of their lives.

The film has a stately and sweeping feeling; it is beautifully shot and ripples like a great wave coming into shore from miles out and then rolling back.

The movie has an epilogue feeling to it.

It is also a reckoning and grand vision of the rise and fall of the once vibrant American subculture we called Organized Crime (a dull name for what it was), but it also offers a mirror of one chapter in America’s turbulent, violent and intense history.

We tend to think our political troubles are new, but they are not, they are quite familiar to historians and people with long memories.

Hoffa is a subtle kind of Trump stand-in, his followers,  blindly cheering on his corruption and abuse of power in the million-member union, whose members would look right at home shaking their firsts and roaring angrily at a MAGA rally in Kentucky.

Thirty years after his classic Goodfellas, Scorcese has plenty of fascinating mob stories to tell in creative, even stunning ways.

All of Scorcese’s mob stories are love stories, surprisingly.

He loved the dons and foot soldiers of the American underworld and took the time to get to know them. He always saw them both as human and vulnerable, even as they murdered and robbed without much shame or hesitation.

Part of the genius of The Irishman is his understanding of the mob criminals of post-war America as being all about family; their crime family, but also their wives, sons, daughters, and friends.

Everything they did revolved around their ideas of family.

They loved, protected, betrayed, and cared for one another in ways that make the murderers of our time seem even more hollow and soulless. At least they killed people for a reason, not because they were shopping or in church.

Even though the movie does not emotionalize or excuse their murders and cruelty, I found myself missing them. They did not slaughter innocents.

They are so much more understandable – and ethical –  than the machine-gun toting bad guys of today.

Organized crime movies prove the relevance of Hannah Arendt’s theory that evil is banal, not dramatic.

Scorcese gets that idea.

As a killer, Sheeran is very good at what he does.

When he heads out to kill a renegade mob boss – Joey Gallo – in New York City, while he is celebrating his birthday with his family,  he reminds himself to wound, not kill, Gallo’s bodyguard.

The guy doesn’t deserve to die, he says thoughtfully, he’s just doing his job. So he shoots him in the arm.

It’s hard to imagine any terrorist or bigoted nationalist or online troll being so considerate of their victims.

Frank Sheeran is a complex and compelling character. DeNiro does him justice.

I think the movie is a remarkable achievement and a moving one. This movie flows gracefully and even gently.

Age and death do hover over the movie.

Scorcese and his stars are septuagenarian actors slowing down and fading from the spotlight. You can’t help but feel they were all making different statements about where they are in their own lives.

I think of the movie not only as a knowing homage and testament to the lost and soon forgotten wise guys of the mob, but also as a kind of the last look, a farewell. The story of organized crime in America is a riveting chapter in our country’s bloody history, which never seems to end.

But the surprise to me is that what powers this movie is love and empathy.

Even as Sheeran kills, Scorcese can’t help but show us his fears, confusion, and broken moral compass. As played by DeNiro, Frank Sheeran is both savage and pathetic.

As he struggles late in life to regain the love of his daughter, he is wholly bewildered about why they are fearful of him, and horrified about what he has become.

Scorcese loves his wise guys and only gets better and gentler at portraying them. He seems to be telling us in this movie that maybe they were not so tough and not so wise. They all seemed frail and vulnerable to me.

I think this is a great American movie; I wouldn’t miss it. If you can, get to a theater and see it on a big screen. If not, it’s already on Netflix, and good for them for funding it and letting Scorcese do it his way.

I can’t quite imagine any other filmmaker would try to top this look at the bad guy culture in America; it has a last word kind of feel to it. See it if you can.

27 April

Review: Avengers Endgame. Riotous Grandiosity

by Jon Katz

(Readers, I never spoil the plots of movies in my reviews, and I didn’t here.)

There is great feeling and engagement in this movie, and true genius in the marketing of it.

If you are approaching the film as a movie with some high standards and critical detachment, it is a pretty wild and but flawed ride.

If you are approaching tis movie as a rabid fan or one of the cult followers Disney is so skilled at creating, it is pure heaven, you will not be disappointed.

There is much hype about not spoiling the film by revealing plot details, and I won’t, of course, but you pretty much know what’s coming all the way through the minute you sit down, especially if you’ve been following the Marvel ride for any length of time.

Those rumors you’ve been hearing are true. Prepare yourself for loss and a dish of bittersweet.

It is a time-honored marketing concept to leak all kinds of rumors in advance of a film, and then beg for silence and restraint. It’s called buzz. The buzz about this movie for a while has been there will be some real sadness and loss, and that is true.

It is also inevitable. All kinds of new heroes and stars are at the gate, raring to go.

The true star of this film is really the Marvel Avenger franchise itself. Marvel is celebrating itself here, and they are not subtle about it.

The Avengers have been marketed,  lionized and romanticized in much the way the Star Wars franchise has been over-hyped and bled to death.  Sequels are by definition anything but fresh and original.

Marvel is ending the Avengers on a high note, for one, the studios didn’t wait too long.

I wish we could like movie franchises without turning them into religious and spiritual experiences. This makes reviewing them complex.

The movie is electric and fast-paced and full of impossibilities.

Don’t even think about following the plot, and the ending, which goes on a minute less than forever is a chaotic, ear-splitting spectacle. If you can follow the time line of this movie, you ought to get on Jeopardy and win a million dollars. I’m not sure it matters.

This is America after all, and Disney never lets us forget about their making money for one single minute of the 180 minutes of the movie. The Avengers were a great and iconic series, the heroes are getting stale and older,  they’re sending it out in style.

They make it very clear that there are more franchises and new stars coming up right behind it. They make it so clear that many of these new stars are in this movie, nobody is waiting for the bodies to get cold.

The major points about the movie.

Real diversity has hit Hollywood, and it is a major event in American culture when so many African-American and female characters play central and heroic roles in a movie, as they did in Endgame. It gives me a lot of hope about the country, no matter what the politicians do.

Perhaps next up will be a gay Superhero, that will be a true test of Disney’s authenticity. This movie looked like America, not  Hollywood’s traditionally narrow vision of America.

In Endgame, our superheroes are all sad and mournful. Sometimes just downers. They have good reason, they lee the earth down bigtime.

Half of the world has been destroyed by the villain Thanos for reasons that are incomprehensible to me.  Something to do with radioactive colored stones.

The Avengers are adrift, depressed and dispirited.  These heroes are not the indestructible heroes of old, they  do not know how to process pain, loss and failure, but they will share their feelings about all three.

The movie focuses skillfully on relationships and friendship, there are witty scenes, touching scenes and confusing scenes.

The plot plays all kinds of games with time, travels backwards and forward.

Speaking only for myself, I often lost track of who was really still alive and who was really dead, and whether we are in the past, the future or the present. If anyone else cares, they have not yet shown themselves.

Some critics have found this brilliant, I found it dizzying.

I’ve been following Marvel for years from its comics to its movies, I thought the movie was overstuffed with characters, scenes and pathos.  It was too long, there were too many stars,  a thousand  twists and turns, and as it happened,  very little of the plot made any sense at all.

Marvel studios – now part of Disney – have been geniuses at taking a once laughed at and inconsequential drama and turning it something popular, profit-making. These superhero films are  important, if not the most important,  happenings in our popular culture right now.

Even the New York Times writes breathless reviews of Marvel movies, they used to turn up their noses at them.

The news is creating a whole new generation of fantasists and escapists, and Marvel knows how to please them.

The movie works best, I think, when it gets human and wise. Life is not glorified here, neither is heroism. Even the most powerful helmets don’t stand up well to a laser blast. and these heroes are anything but omnipotent.

I will say lots of people in the movie theater I went to were sniffing, even sobbing more than once. I teared up twice.

Moviegoers and critics are loving this movie, and it is a monster hit.

Robert Downey stole the show as Ironman, his performance framed the Avenger series from beginning to end. Many say his Ironman really sparked the rise of Marvel Studios. In this movie, he was terrific, a standout.

I loved Chris Hemsworth as a fragile and neurotic Thor running to his mommy, Mark Ruffalo as a re-imagined and very thoughtful hulk, Scarlett Johannson as a melancholic Natasha Romanoff and Paul Rudd as the ridiculous, excitable,  but appealing  Ant-man.

I grew up on Marvel comics, and I am a fan of the superhero genre. It’s about the only mainstream forum for true discussion of values and responsibility in our country at the moment.

In the Avengers, morals really matter, and how many tweets or  movies can you say that about?

I appreciate the streak of humor and wit that runs through the Avenger movies.

I don’t want to say much about the ending except it was a mind-blower on many levels. Too long (three hours is just too long for a movie), too loud, too repetitious, this movie could have shed a half hour easily without pain, except that the last half hour was somewhat shamelessly  constructed by Disney and the Russo brothers to set the stage for what’s to come.

Take out ads, people, please.

At one time the ending might have been controversial and considered a promotional trailer for future films, but that is no longer a problem it seems.

The focus on the humanity and vulnerability of the once confident and almost arrogant Avengers has given way to new sensibilities. They are much softer and more fragile and reflective than I ever remember seeing movie superheroes.

As always, and at the insistence of Stan Lee, the series uses humor continuously and well

A sad movie with lots of laughs.

I think the term riotous grandiosity and sprawling spectacle come to mind, along with delirious absurdity. I think it was the most affecting of the Avenger series and also the most self-referential and congratulatory. (Winter Soldier (2014) was my favorite Marvel movie so far (I haven’t seen them all).

The superhero phenomenon is one of the most interesting cultural phenomenons in my lifetime. The Endgame movie is important, because it marks the end of one period in this culture, and the beginning of another. Movies, like dogs, mirror us, they don’t lead.

This movie felt important to me. Maria was numb by the end, lost in the endless contradictions.

But we both saw the significance.

Endgame marks the end of the white bread male superhero, building on the success of Black Panther, one of the most significant movies in decades. We’re in a new dimension now – blacks, women, hispanics, asians, the future of America, kicking ass all over the galaxy.

Superman looks like a cardboard cutout next to this new generation of heroes, they remind me of us.

The much simpler and whiter Marvel world that I grew up in is officially gone, kissed goodbye by a blockbuster movie that will earn Disney hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars. I felt a lot of emotion seeing this movie,  it reflected the changes in my life as well, comic books were such an important part of my life, and such a respite from misery.

My culture is rich and diverse now, and much more sophisticated. But my comic books meant a lot to me, and the name Marvel carries a lot of punch.

As a child, I couldn’t have begun to imagine so many women and people of color in a movie like this. I need to remind myself that we are changing, and even our elected leaders can’t stop it.

I was saying goodbye to the part of that world that I knew, it’s okay, I handle change well.

In some ways, Avenger Endgame offers us a preview of what’s ahead, and that was pretty clever of Disney, if a bit crass. The critics are used to it by now, nobody even mentions it.

The true creative wizards are those who can see the future coming. Stan Lee saw it clearly. Our world belongs to marketers, not artists. Endgame spells it out for us.

This is a fine family movie, there is sadness, darkness and despair but only a drop or two of blood. Bring some tissues and a pillow to sit on.

10 March

Review: Captain Marvel, Saving The World From Gender Cliches

by Jon Katz

Like all kinds of freaks, I grew up reading Marvel and other comics, I was one of the first in line at the comic book store where the owner saved new issues for me each week. Comics were my cultural life, along with Buddy Holly and my portable radio.

It still startles me – and it pleases me – to see a woman setting out to save the universe. For all of my youth, the heroes were all men, usually iron-headed and humorless.  Women were being saved every day.

Stan Lee always brought some wit into the stories, he never took himself too seriously.

Today, it was a kick for me (and Maria also) to go to a movie and see Carol Danvers (Brie Larson) playing the first female-led superhero film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), the new  Captain Marvel.

There have been solo female Captain Marvels in the comic versions, but never in a feature film.

Superhero movies are coming into their own as a genre, I’m hooked.

I especially loved the last Spiderman, Wonder Woman and almost all of the Avenger series (the next of which, also featuring Carol Danvers) is coming out in seven weeks. The bar is getting higher, those were very good, colorful, full of amazing visual theatrics, funny,  taut, even well-written films.

I’m sorry to say that the new Captain Marvel doesn’t hold up to the standard set in those movies, at least for me.

I found it fun, charming at times, but also flat.  Something was missing.

This superhero is plenty nice, and plenty tough,  but lacks the charisma and strong character of Wonder Woman’s Gal Gadot or Spiderman’s Shameik Moore.

In Captain Marvel (pronounced Mar-Vell),  Carol Danvers succeeds is saving the universe, or most of it (I’m not giving away the plot) from an awful if incomprehensible danger. And all by herself, with the exception of an old pilot pal from training school.

The real war in this movie was against monstrous villains, but against gender cliches, and that may be more important in the long run.

Through the movie, Danvers is challenged by men (and by a software AI villain)  telling her she is too emotional to be effective and successful, the familiar trope used against women for centuries and in the corporate world every day.

She demonstrates forcefully – this is a very satisfying part of the movie, and it’s real heart – that emotions are not a weakness, and  in fact, can be a powerful weapon in the right hands. The more faith Carol has in herself, the stronger and more effective she becomes.

I know that’s what I told my daughter. I hope she believed it.

Disney purchased Marvel Comics last year for $4 billion and has become the rare corporate behemoth that does some good with it’s money. A whole generation of young women – and men – will see a very different kind of hero than I got to see, they are pioneering in producing stories and films about women who shatter stereotypes.

And who save themselves. This has to have a profound effect on our society, a long way from Snow White and Cinderella.

They helped push that stereotype for years, it’s only fitting that they are paying reparations.  Speaking of stereotypes, some things don’t change. Danvers is blasted all over the universe and beaten up a dozen times, not a single hair was ever out of place. Hollywood can only go so far.

Curiously, the movie weaponizes emotion, it turns out to be deadlier than bombs and missiles and the soul-draining barrage of rays and blasts and  explosions. The movie is not too long, for once, nor does it take itself too seriously.

A cat was deployed to provide some fun, but other than that, the movie had a sort of relentlessly even and predictable series of brawls, fighting that never seems to kill people or resolve much until later.

There were few laughs, and little of the irony that always marked the Marvel comics and the best superhero films.

I thought Lashana Lynch, who played a long-lost pilot friend of Danvers, and her daughter, played by Akira Akbar, stole a good part of the movie. They did have lots of character and charisma, they really stood out, they sparkled.

Superheroes have been pushing diversity for some time, they have helped set the stage. I am enjoying the new diversity in Hollywood films, it is both apparent and refreshing.

The movie, directed by Anne Boden and Ryan Fleck, seemed well aware of its duty to be a positive role model for women. There are no timid or dependent women in this film, or any of the Superhero films.

At times, Captain Marvel  veered towards a message movie, but it’s a message that’s long over due and glad to see. I hope the next step for female Hollywood heroes is to accept their strength and rightful place in the world and  just go kick the crap out of bad guys.

This movie, like others before it, upends the stereotype of the damsel in distress, waiting for the prince to show up and give her a kiss. If I were in deep trouble, I would be delighted to text Carol Danvers and have her come and bail me out.

The most sympathetic characters in the movie do need rescuing, all of them, and so does Samuel Jackson playing FBI Agent Nick “Fury” Korath. The universe itself needs a hand as well. Our Carol Danvers is up to it. There is also one of the first AI (Artificial Intelligence) evil doers, played by Annette Benning.

I predict we will see a lot more of them.

Brie Larson is a terrific rescuer, brave and determined and unafraid to use her amazing intuition. She just has to get to know herself.

One curious but interesting feature of the movie was the digital rejuvenation of Samuel Jackson, who appears here as a young federal agent about 30 years younger than he was in his last movie. I did a few double-takes, seeing such a famous star being cinematically photo-shopped in so obvious  a way.

He looked about thirty years old. Perhaps time will soon have no meaning in the movies, and stars will never fade or die.

Besides her emotion, this Captain Marvel ends up sporting some pretty amazing firepower, she literally spits fire from her hands, feet and head, and sails through the skies like a ballistic missile or Superman on speed.

I accept that I am one of the very few SuperHero lovers who still squawks about the plot lines, which makes absolutely no sense at all in this movie, and I would suggest not even trying to follow it. Just go along for the ride.

You will not succeed in remembering the plot, and you will not be able to recount it to a living soul afterwards.

There were a couple of surprising plot twists that boosted the final quarter of the movie quite a bit. Otherwise, the writing was disappointing to me.

This is the last movie the legendary Stan Lee (who has a brief cameo on a subway train) was involved with, he died a few months ago. It does have a familiar comic book feel to it, which is why the plot doesn’t really need to make sense. The comic books never made sense either.

The bottom line is that this is a fun  movie to go and see, a nice way to spend a couple of hours away from Facebook and Twitter and those nasty tweets. I’d give it a B-minus. It is fine to take children too, the violence is so stylized and cartoonish that it doesn’t really even seem like violence, and has little sting.

Superhero characters take a phenomenal beating, they are radiated, blasted, tossed about like feathers in the wind, and indestructible until necessary. But they hardly ever bleed, or even die.

I’m not going into the plot, but I thought the ending did not do justic to the idea of the brave yet compassionate female superhero.

It was mostly about humiliation and dominance, something women know too much about. It would be said if this new iteration of heroes ended up being just like men.

I certainly recommend seeing it, it is, like all superhero movies, an entertaining distraction.

20 April

Book Review: The Truth About Animals By Lucy Cooke. WONDERFUL!

by Jon Katz
The Truth About Animals

As we rush to transform pets and animals into human-like creatures with our intelligence, emotions and values, we are losing sight of what animals are really like.  We shroud them in our myths and needs, we seek to turn them into varying versions of us.

It’s not enough for dogs to be smart, they must be brilliant, wiser than we ever imagined. Animals must now foresee death, spot cancer, check blood sugar, give us 24/7 emotional support, on the ground, in the air, on vacation. We want them to possess unrecognized depths of emotion and consciousness.

It is not enough that we accept them as the wonderful creatures they are, they must be like us, the most conflicted and tormented  and violent species on the earth. Do we hate them this much?

I love animals because they are so different from us, but more and more people are insisting that animals are just like us.

Lucky Cooke doesn’t think they are just like us, and unlike millions of people running their mouths on social media, she knows something about them

Cooke is a filmmaker and National Geographic Explorer with a masters degree in zoology from The University of Oxford.  She is also the founder and President of the Sloth Appreciation Society, which now has about 10,000. Once they receive my check, there will be 10,001.

She has written the most wonderful book,

it’s called “The Truth About Animals: A Menagerie Of The Misunderstood.” I believe it is not an exaggeration to say that for me, this book may be one the best animal books, if not the best,  ever written.

Cooke has gathered together the biggest misconceptions, mistakes and myths we have created about animals, from Aristotle to Walt Disney to your Uncle Harry, and created her own “menagerie of the misunderstood.” Don’t look for sappy rescue stories here, you will learn an awful lot about animals, and you will learn a lot about how much you don’t know.

We are losing track of what animals are actually like, seeing them instead as we need to see them. We project all of our fantasies and needs onto them. We cling to our myths about them, even as we drift farther and farther from the truth about them. Cooke is profoundly knowledgeable, her book is as refreshing  as it is urgently necessary.

In our urbanized and over-developed world, very few people actually get to see the animals Lucky Cooke is writing about any longer, we have driven them out of our habitats and out of our lives. Rather than learn about animals, we increasingly exploit them, increasingly their only work and purpose is to make us feel good about ourselves.

The animals the poachers and developers and greedy corporatists and animal rights myopics don’t get will soon fall prey to climate change and the animal rights movement, which is spending millions of donated dollars to  take animals away from  people and drive them into oblivion.

Most animal books are either sappy or pandering. How Spot rescued me, and I rescued him. Or How My Border Collie learned to speak French and quote the Encyclopedia Brittanica. (And why he was almost certainly abused.)

Cooke is a myth popper, she takes an exhaustive knowledge of medieval animal writing to trace or common views of animals from the silly myths about them to why these myths continue to foster great ignorance about what they are actually like.

It turns out sloths are not lazy, but quite efficient. Penguins are not loyal symbols of family structure, they are quite often unfaithful prostitutes. Hyenas are not cowardly, bats are not vampires in general and vultures are noble and necessary creatures.

Cooke has the advantage not only of being especially knowledgeable. but a gifted and very funny writer. Her essays on beavers and their defensive testicles is a classic. But the wonders never cease in her writing.

We humans may be intolerant and resistant to change, but Penguins have been embracing same-sex partnerships forever. And Moose, who have a tendency to get drunk on certain plants and go on hallucinogenic drug trips.

“When seeking to understand animals,” writes Cooke, “context is key. We have a habit of viewing the animal kingdom through the prism of our own experiences, our own rather narrow existence. The sloths arboreal lifestyle is sufficiently extraterrestrial to make it one of the world’s most misunderstood creatures, but it is by no means along in this category. Life takes a glorious myriad of alien forms, and even the simplest require complex understanding..”

She challenges us to open our minds to the true stories of real animals and discover the truth about them. You will never look at Penguins in the same way when you read about their sex lives and penchant for prostitution.

This is a promise on which Luce Cooke delivers, again and again, from the Eel to the Beaver to the Sloth, Hyena, Vulture, Bat, Frog, Hippo, Moose, Panda, Penguin, Chimpanzee. Each animal has its own myth, each has its own true. And she is funny, there is nothing hectoring or pompous in the book.

The New York Carriage Horses are, to me the most timely argument for Cooke’s message (OK, mine too).

Many animal lovers would rather see these wonderful horses dead or imprisoned in preserves than do their light work amongst people who love them. The reason for this is that the people arguing that work for these animals is cruel know nothing about them.

Work for carriage horses is essential to their health and survival, and they love doing it. The truth might just save their lives.

It is important that we animal lover stop trying to turn out pets and all the animals of the world into us. Look what a mess we have made of the world? Do we really want them to be like us? And get greedy and arrogant and violent and unhappy?

Truth doesn’t matter to a lot of people these days, and we are losing a grip on what it even means,  but it is out there if we are willing to go and find it. That is what  Cooke has done. I doubt there is a single person reading this review who would not love reading The Truth About Animals.

 

8 April

Book Review: Surviving Trauma: The Body Keeps The Score

by Jon Katz
Surviving Trauma

This weekend, I am reading a new book,  it’s called The Body Keeps Score,  and it was written by Dr. Bessel Van Der Kolk, he is the founder and medical director of the Trauma Center in Brookline, Massachusetts, and is considered one of the world’s leading researchers and authorities on  trauma and recovery.

Maria and I have been taking turns reading pages to one another Saturday afternoon, and there is something revealing or helpful in almost every chapter. We have both been diagnosed as trauma survivors,  we both have dealt with Post Traumatic Stress  (PTSD)and its symptoms.

The book is impressive, clearly and well written, well-organized and thoroughly researched.  And timely.

This is not woo-woo stuff, it is quite scientific, Van Der Kolk became famous for his work and treatment of PTSD as it afflicted soldiers returning from war. He pioneered  the idea that trauma reminds stored in our bodies, not only our conscious minds, and that trauma can only be  healed if the body is treated as well as the mind.

One does not have to be a combat soldier, writes Van Der Kolk, or a Syrian refugee or survivor of massacres in Congo to encounter trauma and suffer from it. Trauma happens to so many of us, to our friends, our families and our neighbors.

Research by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has found that one in five Americans was sexually molested as a child; one in four was beaten by a parent to the point of leaving marks on their bodies, and one in three couples engages in physical violence. A quarter of us grew up with alcoholic relative and one of eight children witnessed their mothers being beaten or hit.

That list does not included the many thousands, if not millions,  of veterans who have suffered PTSD, a casualty of war that governments and armies almost never want to talk about or fully acknowledge.

Trauma is defined by the American Psychological Association as the emotional response someone has to an extremely negative event. While trauma is a normal reaction to an awful event or experience,  sometimes the effects are so severe they interfere with normal life and cause emotional instability.

Some of the most frequent causes of trauma are violence, natural disasters,  extreme political upheaval, severe illness or injury, the death of a loved one, or even a pet, or witnessing acts of violence.

Some researchers believe watching the modern incarnation of news – continuous conflict and graphic videos and reports shown repeatedly day after day, sometimes hundreds of times – can trigger trauma in many people.

A growing number of psychiatrists and psychologists and social workers report that the November election was a trauma for many people, a kind of violence and injury to the cultural system. This makes sense to me,  I have seen trauma symptoms in many people who were shocked and upset by the election and its aftermath.

Trauma, by definition, Van Der Kolk writes, is unbearable and intolerable.

“Most rape victims, combat soldiers, and children who have been molested,” he writes, “become so upset  when they think about what they experienced that they try to push it out of their minds, trying to act as if nothing happened, and move on. It takes tremendous energy to keep functioning while carrying the memory of terror, and the shame of utter weakness and vulnerability.”

Maria and I have both experienced trauma and have benefited from some of the techniques and approaches Van Der Kolk writes about – meditation, yoga, eye and body movements, breathing techniques.

What happened cannot be undone. Nobody can treat abuse or rape or terror or grief and make the source of it go away.

The challenge of recovery is to reestablish ownership of your body and your mind – of your self. To take responsibility for facing what has happened to you.

This means feeling free to know what you know and to feel what you feel without becoming overwhelmed, enraged, ashamed, or paralyzed.

For most people,  this involves 1/finding a way to become calm and focused, 2/ learning to maintain calm in response to images, thoughts, sounds, or physical sensations that remind you of the past, 3/finding a way to be fully alive in the present and engaged with the people around you, 4/ not having to keep secrets  from yourself or others, including secrets about the ways that  you have managed to survive.

I have come to realize that my response to trauma has been my writing and my blog, Maria’s her art.

I have incorporated breathing and meditation into my daily life, I am learning to be calm in response to the disappointments, conflicts and surprises that trigger my trauma symptoms, I have come to see most fear and anxiety and panic as a symptom of illness, not as reality, I believe in being fully present in my life and engaged with people I have come to love and truth, and I have nearly come to worship the idea of being open and authentic in my writing.

My writing anchors me, the process of being open about me life heals me.

I fully accept that traumatic events in my life remain stored in my body and in what researches call my “emotional brain,” and that the body needs to be treated apart from talking therapy.

I have no secrets, either from myself or from others. I have no secrets to keep, I am liberated from hiding. When you have no secrets,  you are free, there is nothing to fear. On my blog and in my books, I often write about the ways in which I have managed to survive, and so has Maria.

“The Body Keeps Score” is an impressive work, it is wise and helpful and credible, every word of it rings true to me. I have been dealing with trauma my whole life, and Dr. Ven Der Kolk knows his stuff.

“In order to regain control over yourself,” writes Dr. Van Der Kolk, “you need to revisit the trauma: sooner or later you need to confront what has happened to you, but only after you feel safe and will not be re-traumatized by it. The first order of business is to find ways to cope with feeling overwhelmed by the sensations and emotions associated with the past.”

I highly recommend this new book to the many people out there reading this who have experienced trauma in their lives and recognize the symptoms. I want to write more about it as I absorb it and think about it.

You can read an interview with Dr. Van Der Kolk here.

Bedlam Farm